Friday, October 19, 2007
Wordiness: C2DE
Technically, it's not quite a word but it's not an acronym either. I was reading about the internal reorganisation of BBC News and "C2DE" kept popping up without explanatory notes.Turns out it's UK jargon, springing from the terminology of that country's National Readership Survey, where grade C2 refers to skilled manual workers, D to semi- and unskilled manual workers and E to pensioners, widows, casual or lowest-grade earners (more details here, if you really must know). "C2DE" is shorthand for all these groups, i.e. roughly synonymous with "working class".
And I thought Singapore was bad with the obfuscating language!
Technorati Tags: wordiness, C2DE, working class
Labels: Wordiness
posted by Tym at 9:10 AM
1 Comments
-
At 10/19/2007 7:08 PM
said... Well, the apple sure didn't fall far from that tree.
Heh.
Trackbacks
Create a Link (for Blogger users)
Profile
About Me
- Name: Tym
I write - for a living, for this blog, for love, for money, for them, for me - for life.
- toomanythoughts [at] Gmail
Recent Posts
- The things I do for my cat
- Getting out for a change
- Writing style
- The appetite strikes back
- False start
- Barely eating
- A hodge-podge of stories
- Fighting the good fight
- Another reason the news in Singapore annoys me
- Champagne and celluloid
Labels
- Books books books
- Domestically challenged
- Food for thought
- Freelancin' living
- Geek girl
- Gender agenda
- Kitty corner
- Life in the internet age
- Memed
- Nightlife
- Once a teacher
- Personal
- Pop culture
- Singapore stories
- Site foo
- Travel babble
- Twitteresque
- Wordiness
- Words words words
Archives
- August 2001
- September 2001
- October 2001
- November 2001
- December 2001
- January 2002
- February 2002
- March 2002
- April 2002
- May 2002
- June 2002
- August 2003
- September 2003
- October 2003
- November 2003
- December 2003
- January 2004
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
Friends Blog Too!
- terse and at large
- Yu Hui's World of Wonder
- The Play Pen for My Thoughts
- empty_vessels
- Stellou
- ampulets
- Holy Smokes!!!
- CATch-Up!
- Thirty Pounces
- Monster Ru
- Taekwon-Dodo
- The BoKoLog
- :: UNIT _log ::
- Abigael
- beeker: full of hot air
- maye
- ®
- lisa montgomery
- welcome to her world
- Tofu Nation
- k i t s c h y p o t e m k i n
- the trapeze, please
- sweet milk*
- Keeping In View
- mr brown
- Popagandhi
- Little Miss Drinkalot
- frío beso de nubes
- A Gonzo Journal
- dsng.net - the Daryl sng blog
- Sunlight follows me
- Almost Infamous
- My Very Own Glob: {Curiosa Felicitas}
- Balderdash!
- Tinker, Tailor
- Singapore Serf
- Confessions of A Critic
- Samsies - updated whimsically
- Singapore Angle
- Snog Blog
- My LiveJournal friends
Others Blog Too!
- being jennifer garrett
- By The Way
- Capitalism Bad, Tree Pretty
- CHRISTASTROPHE
- Darren Barefoot
- Faulty Vision
- Flying Low
- Medea Sin
- naif's journal
- The Travelling Hungryboy
- Trisha Reloaded
- two peas, no pod
- umami
- Whatever
- Wil Wheaton dot Net
- Will Type For Food
- WWdN: In Exile
Credits
Extras
-
-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 License. - The opinions and viewed expressed in this blog have absolutely nothing to do with my employers or clients, past or present. They are mine and mine alone. Any resemblance to said employers' or clients' views is either imaginary or coincidental, but most certainly not intentional.